Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 00:02
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Texas woman dies from brain-eating amoeba after clearing sinuses with tap water - Dallas News
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
What’s next?
Russia can stop this any time.
1.5 TB of James Webb Space Telescope data just hit the internet - theregister.com
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Why is the US going after Canada after all? What is the reason for all this hostility?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Thank you.
Can you name a female actress who has had bad timing or luck in her film career?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
$14B in EV, renewable projects scrapped as tax credit fears grow - Electrek
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Acting NASA Administrator Janet Petro June 6, 2025 - NASA Watch
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.